If you are visually impaired or blind, you can visit the PDF version by Pressing CONTROL + ALT + 4
You need a JavaScript-enabled browser to view this Publication
Please follow these steps to view the Publication:
Enable JavaScript in your browser
Refresh this page
Best regards
Zmags
3
FORWARD
Friends, colleagues, and fellow citizens,
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into the legal profession represents both a remarkable
opportunity and a formidable challenge. As AI technology continues to evolve at a rapid pace, it is reshaping the
landscape of legal practice, enhancing efficiency, expanding access to justice, and revolutionizing practice
management. With these advancements come critical ethical, professional, and regulatory considerations that must
be addressed to ensure AI serves the public interest while upholding the integrity of the legal system and the rule
of law.
This report provides a comprehensive exploration of AI’s impact on legal practice, focusing on four key areas:
practice management, ethics, access to justice, and the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). As the legal profession
stands at the crossroads of tradition and techno
3 FORWARD Friends, colleagues, and fellow
4 be used responsibly to bridge the justice gap
5 AI WORKGROUP MISSION STATEMENT In furthe
6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Members of the State B
7 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........
8 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED UNAUTHORIZED
9 INTRODUCTION “AI is like electricity. Ju
10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Artificial Intelligenc
11 Lawyers require skills such as analytical an
12 by the Legal Services Corporation revealed t
13 LOOKING BACK BEFORE MOVING FORWARD A HIST
14 boom10 with breakthroughs in research and a
15 However, with these inevitable changes come
16 PRACTICE MANAGEMENT: PRACTICING LAW IN T
17 Prior to delving into each o
18 the most established technological tools, la
19 so is groundedness. A responsive output is g
20 As discussed previously, document review, an
21 legal intern when questioned by the judge. T
22 OUTCOME PREDICTION Case prediction conducted
23 continues to meet their professional and eth
24 is encrypted both while it's
25 USE OF AI IN THE COURTS Many individual cour
26 ETHICS: THE BALANCE BETWEEN ETHICS AND A
27 DUTY OF COMPETENCE MRPC 1.1 provides the fol
28 DUTY OF DILIGENCE MRPC 1.3 provides the fol
29 A lawyer’s duty of communication includes d
30 DUTY OF REASONABLE FEES MRPC 1.5 provides th
31 motion and not the approximately three hours
32 As the State Bar of Michigan’s FAQ54 states,
33 CANDOR TOWARD THE TRIBUNAL MRPC 3.3 provides
34 MRPC 8.4 provides it is professional miscond
35 viewpoints of the people it previously engag
36 The ethical obligation that lawyers have to
37 SUMMARY The ethical responsibilities a lawye
38 UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW: AI’S IMPAC
39 In Michigan, the unauthorized practice of la
40 service programs, yet this statute may provi
41 This dichotomy is not new, and new technolog
42 SUMMARY The questions raised by AI in the UP
43 ACCESS TO JUSTICE: OPENING THE LEGAL WOR
44 When faced with legal problems, low-income h
45 the issue, and may then determine if they wi
46 Third, AI-based programs are
47 PUBLIC POLICY: THE REGULATION OF AI IN T
48 RECOMMENDATIONS When using AI, the bene
49 CONCLUSION AI has the power to revoluti
50 AUTHORS: MEMBERS OF THE SBM AI WORKGROUP
51 Gerard Mantese is a trial attorney at Mantes
52 David R. Watson joined ICLE in January 2017
53 TERMINOLOGY The following are common AI T
Natural language processing (NLP): The ability