If you are visually impaired or blind, you can visit the PDF version by Pressing CONTROL + ALT + 4
You need a JavaScript-enabled browser to view this Publication
Please follow these steps to view the Publication:
Enable JavaScript in your browser
Refresh this page
Best regards
Zmags
Learning
from Learning
Environments
An innovation project by lekolar
in collaboration with Atea
1
Executive Summary
BACKGROUND. Schools are a significant investment for society and must function for
several decades. To meet the future educational needs, the pedagogical vision of schools will
need to shift towards innovative learning, focusing more on collaboration, interdisciplinary
approaches, and students’ well-being. A better understanding of how to optimize the school
learning environment is therefore necessary.
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether, through data collection
of movement patterns, physical parameters, surveys, observations, and spatial understanding
in a specific case study, we could create an evidence-based service to systematically test,
improve, and confirm the optimal functioning of a learning environment. This was done by
Learning from Learning Environments An innovatio
Executive Summary BACKGROUND. Schools are a s
CASE STUDY. The method triangulation was tested o
MARIA SVENSSON Interior Architect Lekolar
Introduction FOREWORD In 2020, Lekolar and
Content This report provides a detailed accou
CHAPTER 1 Background A service for analyzing a
The School of the Future During the 2020s, man
Learning from Learning Environments How do we e
CHAPTER 2 Data Collection Method How do we mea
Two primary goals The purpose of measuring a s
Method triangulation Method triangulation is o
Surveys Method triangulation Physical Obs
Using a triangulation of methods that includes su
Student and teacher survey A survey, or questi
Class observations Observation is a technique
Physical parameters Collecting data using phys
CHAPTER 3 Case Study How do we create a dynami
Purpose of the case study The purpose of the c
Limitations of the case study P H Y S I C A L
PROCESS AND SPATIAL ANALYSIS Joakim was highly m
DIRECTION IN THE ROOM – SUPPORTING THE TEACHER’S
ACTIVITY-BASED FURNISHING – SUPPORTING SUBJECT AN
VARIED SEATING OPTIONS – INDIVIDUALIZATION AND WE
SELECTED SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT Based on the need
The placement of the furnitures freed up the rema
The wooden counter table in the centre, with a he
the wall which the students could set up on the t
Hypotheses The goal of the room design was thu
CHAPTER 4 Data collection of the case study H
Student survey The student survey was compiled
SAFETY Compared to your other traditional classr
Teacher survey The teacher survey was slightly
WELL-BEING 1. How do you generally like the cl
Classroom observations The observations took pl
CONCENTRATION 1. Can students concentrate duri
Type of activity Physical parameters The phy
PEOPLE COUNTERS. Two people counters were used to
Sound level & control parameters For sound lev
AIR QUALITY. Children and adolescents are particu
LIGHT QUALITY. The benefits of good natural light
CHAPTER 5 Results and analysis of the case stu
Phase 1: 1 March 2022 - 29 April 2022 Student s
WELL-BEING The well-being in the classroom was v
INDIVIDUALIZATION 73% of the students said they
The red sofas were also liked because they were c
VARIATION While the overwhelming majority (91%)
(30%) or ’easier’ (48%) to work individually in t
Control variables GENDER IDENTITY Boys said th
89% of the boys and 83% of the girls felt very go
Teacher survey results (Phase 1) The teacher f
N O T E : In the interior design solution, we had
Class observation results (Phase 1) The observ
The observation summary is written against our fiv
Hypothesis 2: The placement of furniture in the s
Hypothesis 3: The subject-based classroom’s inter
Hypothesis 4: The subject-based classroom’s inter
Hypothesis 5: The subject-based classroom, with a
Observation conclusion Data from the observati
A deeper analysis of the carbon dioxide levels sh
CONCLUSIONS TO THE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS 1. Do st
Physical parameters conclusion The control var
Evaluation after the first phase As all three da
CONTROL VARIABLES • Temperature - • Lig
Phase 2: 3 May 2022 - 5 June 2022 As described
Student survey results (Phase 2) The same numbe
Students had different opinions on why they prefe
Teacher survey results (Phase 2) The teacher f
Classroom observation results (Phase 2) The ob
Hypothesis 2: The placement of furniture in the s
Hypothesis 3: The classroom provides an interior
Observation conclusion The second observation
SOUND. As per phase 1, all classes had a similar
Final conclusion Even though the observation m
CHAPTER 6 Evaluation of the data collection me
Confirmation of results As expected, the method
Refutation of results The strength of method t
Conclusion The method triangulation worked wel
How well did each individual method work? HOW
HOW WE DETERMINED IF THE PROJECT GOALS WERE MET.
HOW WELL DID THE PHYSICAL PARAMETERS WORK? The p
FUNCTION OF THE MOVEMENT PATTERN MEASUREMENT (HEA
CHAPTER 7 Next steps How can this project be d
The goal of this report and the project ”Learning
Standardization of measurement methods Several
PHYSICAL PARAMETERS • Evaluate, improve, and
102