<br />
Ipls Proceedings<br />
State Bar of Michigan<br />
Volume 25 • Issue 3 • 2014<br />
In ThIs Issue<br />
U.S. Supreme Court Patent<br />
Case Review...................................... 1<br />
View from the Chair ................................ 2<br />
Contingency Fees for IP Cases – Why<br />
They Make Sense .............................. 8<br />
Patent Prosecution: Section 101<br />
Rejections After Alice ....................... 10<br />
Preliminary Examination Instructions in<br />
view of the Supreme Court Decision<br />
in Alice Corporation Ply. Ltd. v. CLS<br />
Bank International, et al. .................. 10<br />
Supreme Court: Generic Computer<br />
Implementation Does Not Render<br />
Abstract Ideas Patentable................ 13<br />
Alice Aftermath: Frequent 101 Rejections<br />
and Infrequent Allowance in<br /<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 1" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=1"> Ipls Proceedings State Bar of Mi</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 2" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=2"> View from the Chair The New Year is just</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 3" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=3"> U.S. Supreme Court Patent Case Review ... Continu</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 4" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=4"> functioned as the intermediary. One Alice patent </a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 5" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=5"> Supreme C</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 6" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=6"> to be applied as of the application filing date. </a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 7" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=7"> tion, and is available when, based on the totalit</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 8" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=8"> U.S. Supreme Court Patent Case Review ... Continu</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 9" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=9"> Second, many patents and trademarks are hel</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 10" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=10"> Patent Prosecution: Section 101 Rejections After </a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 11" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=11"> The purpose of this memorandum is to provide prel</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 12" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=12"> and the other exceptions. Thus, an invention is n</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 13" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=13"> version process (Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 14" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=14"> generic computer. The Court emphasized that “[s]t</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 15" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=15"> Alice Aftermath: Frequent 101 Rejections and Infr</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 16" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=16"> Prevalence of Allowances has Selectively and Dram</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 17" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=17"> is to be committed to an innovation upon receivin</a>
<a title="IPLS Proceedings Vol 25 No 3 page 18" href="http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/709f3aa7?page=18"> Upcoming Events 2015 Intellectual Property Law </a>